Proof of reserves and segregation at an OTC desk: what to ask before sending size
Proof of reserves shows a desk's crypto holdings exist at a point in time; segregation is the legal rule that keeps your money and crypto separate from the desk's own if it fails. A snapshot alone proves nothing about insolvency. Check both, plus the desk's VARA licence, before sending a large ticket.
KEY FACTS
| Regulator | VARA (Dubai, outside the DIFC) |
|---|---|
| Segregation rule | VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook: Part IV, Client Money Rules (money); Part V, Client Virtual Assets Rules (crypto) |
| Reserve assets rule | VARA Company Rulebook, Rule VI.E: 100% of client liabilities, same asset, reconciled daily, independent audit at least every six months |
| Reserve audit scope | VARA circular of 6 October 2026: seven minimum audit checks |
| Common proof-of-reserves methods | Merkle-tree attestation, third-party audit, public wallet verification |
| Licence check | VARA public register, by licence number |
| IWGT licence | VL/24/12/002 |
| Typical desk minimum | From around 100,000 USDT |
Source: VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook, Parts IV and V; VARA Company Rulebook, Rule VI.E; VARA circular of 6 October 2026; VARA public register, as of October 2026.
What is proof of reserves at a crypto OTC desk?
Proof of reserves is evidence, published on a stated date, that a custodian or OTC desk actually holds the crypto assets it says it holds. It answers one question only: do the coins exist, right now, at the address or in the account the firm points to. Our broader OTC desk verification checklist covers this alongside nine other checks; this guide narrows in on reserves and segregation because clients sending six-figure tickets ask about them most.
Three methods cover most of what firms in the industry call proof of reserves. A Merkle-tree attestation lets an individual client confirm their own balance is included in the firm's published total, without seeing any other client's balance, using a cryptographic hash tree rather than a full ledger. A third-party audit or attestation report has an accounting or assurance firm check on-chain holdings against a snapshot of client balances on an agreed date. Public wallet verification is the simplest: the firm publishes its wallet addresses so anyone can check the balance on a block explorer.
Each of these methods proves the same narrow thing: reserves existed on the date checked. On its own, none of them proves anything about the day before or the day after. The independent reserve audit that VARA requires of licensed firms is different, because VARA expects it to cover a whole review period, not a single date (see VARA's October 2026 circular below).
How is segregation different from proof of reserves?
Segregation is the legal separation of client assets, money and crypto alike, from a firm's own, held in accounts and wallets a firm cannot use to pay its own expenses, debts or losses. Where proof of reserves is a technical snapshot, segregation is a standing legal rule: it applies every day, not only on the date of a published attestation.
In the UAE, a licensed Virtual Asset Service Provider must hold client money in client bank accounts apart from its own funds under the VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook, Part IV, Client Money Rules. Those rules do not cover crypto.
Client virtual assets, such as USDT, fall under Part V, Client Virtual Assets Rules: they must sit in wallets separate from the firm's own coins, labelled "Client VA Wallet" in its books, and they do not form part of the firm's estate if it becomes insolvent (checked October 2026).
These obligations sit with the licence, not with any voluntary attestation a firm chooses to publish. An unlicensed counterparty can publish a wallet balance too; it has no equivalent legal duty to keep client assets away from its own.
Why doesn't proof of reserves replace segregation?
Proof of reserves and segregation answer two different questions, and passing one tells you nothing about the other. Proof of reserves proves assets are physically present today; it does not prove you have a legal claim on them if the firm stops operating tomorrow.
A firm can publish a clean reserves snapshot on Monday and still fail on Wednesday if the coins it showed you were never legally ring-fenced from its own creditors. Several unlicensed crypto platforms have collapsed after publishing reserves figures that looked reassuring right up to the point client assets were mixed with company funds and used elsewhere. Segregation, backed by a real licence and a regulator who can enforce it, is what determines whether client assets sit outside the firm's estate when things go wrong; a snapshot cannot do that job on its own.
What does VARA's reserve assets audit circular require?
Every VARA-licensed firm must hold the crypto it owes clients 1:1, in the same asset, reconcile it daily, and have it audited by an independent auditor at least every six months. VARA's circular of 6 October 2026, "Reserve Assets Audit Report", sets the minimum scope of that audit.
| Question | Requirement | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| What | Reserves equal to 100% of client liabilities at all times, one-to-one in the same virtual asset. Client crypto in separate client wallets, not rehypothecated without explicit prior client consent and the right licence | Company Rulebook VI.E.1 and VI.E.2; Compliance and Risk Management (CRM) Rulebook V.B.3 and V.B.4 |
| How often | Reconciled daily, client by client. Audited no less than every six months | Company Rulebook VI.E.3; CRM Rulebook V.D.1 |
| By whom | An independent third-party auditor. The firm, its Board, its Senior Executive Officer and its control functions stay responsible | Company Rulebook VI.E.3; VARA circular, 6 October 2026 |
VARA issued the circular after reviewing all proof of reserve assets reports submitted in 2025. At a minimum, it expects the auditor to cover seven points for the review period.
| # | What the auditor should check |
|---|---|
| 1 | Reserves stayed at or above 100% of client liabilities throughout the period, not only on one date |
| 2 | Reserves were held in the same type of virtual asset, with no substitution by another asset or equivalent value |
| 3 | Every client wallet was in scope: hot, warm and cold, wallet infrastructure providers and third-party custodians |
| 4 | Whether client crypto was segregated from the firm's own coins, identifying any commingling |
| 5 | Whether the firm kept control of every client wallet during the period, with each custody set-up described |
| 6 | Daily reconciliation took place and works, backed by evidence |
| 7 | Whether any rehypothecation, lending, pledging or other use of client crypto took place |
The report should give a conclusion for each point and name any exceptions, scope limitations and matters that could not be independently verified. Where independent evidence is reasonably available, management representations alone are not enough.
What you can ask a desk for as a result
The audit report goes to VARA with the firm's next quarterly submission. Neither Rule VI.E nor the circular says a firm must publish it, so a desk may not share the full report. You can still ask a VARA-licensed desk, in writing, for:
- the date of its latest reserve assets audit and the review period it covered;
- the name of the audit firm;
- whether all seven points and every wallet were in scope;
- the conclusion, with any exceptions or scope limitations and how they were dealt with.
What does each control prove, and what does it not?
The table below separates what each control actually proves from what it does not, and how a client can check it before sending a large ticket.
| Control | What it proves | What it does NOT prove | How to verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proof of reserves | Assets existed at a stated address or account on the snapshot date | Legal ownership if the firm fails; that reserves are unchanged since the snapshot | Ask for the latest attestation, its date, and the specific asset and network it covers |
| Client asset segregation | Client money and client crypto are held apart from the firm's own funds and coins, as a standing legal duty | That the firm currently holds any specific reserves at all | Ask the desk to confirm segregated-account status in writing and check its licence conditions |
| VARA reserve assets audit | An independent auditor checked that client crypto was held 1:1, in the same asset, throughout a review period | Holdings after the review period ended; it is filed with VARA, and neither Rule VI.E nor the circular says it must be published | Ask for the audit date, review period, audit firm and conclusion, including any exceptions and scope limitations |
| VARA licence | The firm is supervised by VARA, including the Client Money Rules, the Client Virtual Assets Rules and the reserve assets rule, and appears in a public register | Specific real-time balances, or that a trade can never lose value: virtual assets stay volatile | Search the licence number in the VARA public register |
A snapshot, a standing rule, a periodic audit and a supervised licence answer different questions. A large ticket deserves all of them, not one in place of the others.
Our own licence check is linked from the licence section of the main page, and the step-by-step process is in our one-minute VARA licence check guide. Reading the entry alongside how the VARA framework is built shows why the register, not a firm's own marketing page, is the check that counts.
What should you ask an OTC desk before sending a large ticket?
Before sending a ticket from around 100,000 USDT upward, ask the desk these eight questions in writing. A desk unwilling to answer any of them plainly has already answered the bigger question.
-
CHECK 1
Is the licence active and does it cover dealing?
Match the licence number, company name and licensed activity in the VARA public register — advisory-only licences do not cover dealing in size.
-
CHECK 2
Are client funds held in segregated accounts?
Ask the desk to confirm in writing that client money sits in client bank accounts and client crypto in separate client wallets, apart from its own funds and coins, as VARA's Client Money Rules and Client Virtual Assets Rules require.
-
CHECK 3
What proof-of-reserves method do you use, and when?
Ask which method — Merkle-tree attestation, third-party audit, or public wallet — and the exact date of the most recent published check.
-
CHECK 4
Does the attestation cover my specific asset and network?
A single aggregate figure across all assets tells you less than a line item for USDT on the network you are actually trading, such as TRC20.
-
CHECK 5
Who performed the audit, and can I see the report?
Ask for the auditor or attestor's name and a copy of the report itself, not a summary claim repeated on a marketing page. For a VARA-licensed desk, ask about its latest independent reserve assets audit: date, review period and conclusion.
-
CHECK 6
Where would my funds sit if the desk failed tomorrow?
A clear answer names segregation and the licence behind it; a vague answer about "insurance" or "reserves" is not the same protection.
-
CHECK 7
Will settlement pay only to my own bank account?
Confirm this during onboarding — a desk willing to pay a third-party account on request is telling you something about its controls.
-
CHECK 8
Can I get all of this in one written message first?
The licence number, segregation confirmation and reserves method should arrive together, in writing, before you send anything.
None of these checks slow down a legitimate trade — a desk that answers cleanly can usually do so within the hour, inside its normal quote process. A desk that stalls, deflects, or offers a rate discount instead of an answer is showing you the same pattern covered in our guide to crypto OTC scam patterns in Dubai.
The bottom line on proof of reserves and segregation
Proof of reserves and segregation are not substitutes for each other, and a desk that only offers one is only half-answering the question a large ticket deserves. Ask for a dated attestation and a written confirmation of segregated accounts, then confirm the licence behind both in the VARA public register before you send. For a VARA-licensed desk, also ask for the date, review period and conclusion of its latest independent reserve assets audit.
FAQ
What is proof of reserves in crypto?
Proof of reserves is evidence, published at a specific date, that a custodian or desk holds the crypto assets it claims to hold — usually shown through a Merkle-tree attestation, a third-party audit, or a public on-chain wallet.
Does proof of reserves mean my funds are safe?
No. Proof of reserves shows assets existed on the day it was taken; it says nothing about whether those assets are legally yours if the firm becomes insolvent the next day. That legal protection comes from segregation, not from a snapshot.
What is the difference between segregation and proof of reserves?
Proof of reserves is a technical check that coins exist. Segregation is a legal rule: VARA requires client money in client bank accounts and client crypto in separate client wallets, apart from the firm's own. Client crypto is not part of the firm's estate if it fails.
Does a VARA-licensed desk have to hold client crypto 1:1?
Yes. Under VARA Company Rulebook Rule VI.E, a licensed firm must hold reserves equal to 100% of what it owes clients, in the same virtual asset, reconciled daily and independently audited at least every six months. A VARA circular of 6 October 2026 sets the audit's minimum scope.
How do I verify an OTC desk's VARA licence?
Search the desk's licence number in the VARA public register and confirm the company name, licence status and licensed activity match what the desk told you. The check is free and takes about a minute.
What is a Merkle-tree proof of reserves?
A Merkle-tree proof of reserves lets you confirm your individual balance is included in a firm's published total without revealing any other client's balance, using a cryptographic hash tree rather than a full ledger disclosure.
Trade with a desk that segregates client funds by rule, not by promise
IWGT is a VARA-licensed Broker-Dealer in Dubai. Client funds are held in accounts segregated from our own operating capital under the Client Money Rules, and our licence is verifiable in the public register before you send a single dirham.
SOURCES
- VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook, Part IV, Client Money Rules, accessed 12 October 2026.
- VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook, Part IV, A. Application and Interpretation (Rule IV.A.2: Client Money does not include virtual assets), accessed 12 October 2026.
- VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook, Part V, Client Virtual Assets Rules, B. Treatment of Client VAs (Rules V.B.2 to V.B.4), accessed 12 October 2026.
- VARA Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook, Part V, D. Reconciliation (Rules V.D.1 and V.D.2), accessed 12 October 2026.
- VARA Company Rulebook, Part VI, Capital and Prudential Requirements, E. Reserve Assets (Rule VI.E), accessed 12 October 2026.
- VARA, Circular: Reserve Assets Audit Report, 6 October 2026 (PDF), linked from VARA News and Announcements, accessed 12 October 2026.
- VARA public register, licence status check, accessed 12 October 2026.
- IWGT published pricing bands and onboarding requirements — IWGT published pricing bands, September 2026.
This guide is informational and is not legal, tax or investment advice, nor an invitation to buy or sell any virtual asset. Rules and figures are as of October 2026. Re-check the sources before acting. Virtual assets may lose their value in full or in part and are subject to extreme volatility.